Skin Cancer Risk of Narrow-Band UV-B (TL-01) Phototherapy: A Multi-Center Registry Study with 4,815 Patients.

Narrow-band TL-01 ultraviolet B phototherapy (TL-01) is an effective and widely used treatment for many skin diseases. The purpose of the investigation was to assess the risk of skin cancers in patients treated with TL-01 phototherapy who have not received any other phototherapy modalities. This cohort study included 4,815 TL-01 treated patients in Finland with psoriasis or atopic dermatitis. Clinical information was collected from the hospital records and linked with Finnish Cancer Registry data. The follow-up started from the first TL-01 treatment and the mean follow-up time was 8.4 years. Standardized incidence ratios were calculated for basal cell carcinoma, cutaneous melanoma, and squamous cell carcinoma. The standardized incidence ratio for basal cell carcinoma was 2.5 (95% confidence interval 1.8-3.5), for cutaneous melanoma 4.0 (95% confidence interval 2.1-6.8) and for squamous cell carcinoma 3.7 (95% confidence interval 1.7-7.0). For basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, the standardized incidence ratios remained similar during the whole follow-up time while the standardized incidence ratio for cutaneous melanoma was markedly higher during the first 5 years of follow-up. In conclusion, an increased incidence of skin cancers was observed among TL-01 treated patients. It should be confirmed in the future whether the skin cancer risk of TL-01 phototherapy will remain high in a longer follow-up.

The top 100 most cited articles in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma over the last decade: A bibliometric analysis and review.

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) represents the most prevalent cancer globally. The past decade has witnessed significant advancements in BCC treatment, primarily through bibliometric studies. Aiming to perform a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of BCC treatments to comprehend the research landscape and identify trends within this domain, a dataset comprising 100 scientific publications from the Web of Science Core Collection was analyzed. Country co-operation, journal co-citation, theme bursts, keyword co-occurrence, author co-operation, literature co-citation, and field-specific references were examined using VOSviewer and CiteSpace visualization tools. These articles, published between 2013 and 2020, originated predominantly from 30 countries/regions and 159 institutions, with the USA and Germany at the forefront, involving a total of 1118 authors. The keyword analysis revealed significant emphasis on the hedgehog pathway, Mohs micrographic surgery, and photodynamic therapy. The research shows developed nations are at the forefront in advancing BCC therapies, with significant focus on drugs targeting the hedgehog pathway. This treatment avenue has emerged as a crucial area, meriting considerable attention in BCC therapeutic strategies.

[Chinese guildeline on diagnosis and treatment of basal cell carcinoma (2023 edition)].

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common skin malignancy, with a higher prevalence in Caucasians than in East Asians. Although there is a lack of epidemiological data in China, it is generally believed that the incidence of BCC in China is increasing due to the aging population. A variety of risk factors are related to the occurrence of BCC, among which ultraviolet rays and gene mutations play a major role, especially the abnormal activation of Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway, which is considered to be the most important pathogenesis of BCC. The clinical manifestations of BCC are highly specific, and most experienced doctors can make a preliminary diagnosis by clinical manifestations. Dermoscopy and other imaging methods can greatly improve the accuracy of diagnosis, but there are still some atypical or rare types of BCC that need further confirmation through histopathological examination. This guideline is initiated by the National Clinical Research Center for Skin and Immune Diseases (based on Peking University First Hospital). It has invited a panel of experts consisting of 24 senior dermatologists specializing in dermatologic surgery from the Dermatologic Surgery Group of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association of Dermatology, the Dermatologic Surgery Group of the Dermatology & Venereology Committee, Chinese Association of Integration Medicine, and the Dermatologic Surgery and Cosmetic Branch of Clina Leprosy Association. In addition, experts from the Burn and Plastic Surgery (Maxillofacial), Ophthalmology, Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Radiation Therapy, and Pathology were also invited to participate. This panel forms the "Chinese Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Basal Cell Carcinoma" expert group. Based on the latest domestic and international research findings, the guideline was developed through four rounds of discussions by the expert group and revised to provide valuable references for clinical healthcare providers in the diagnosis and treatment of BCC.

Japanese Dermatological Association guidelines: Outlines of Japanese clinical guidelines for basal cell carcinoma 2021.

To summarize the current therapies for skin cancers, the Japanese Skin Cancer Society issued the first guidelines for skin cancers, including melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma (BCC), and extramammary Paget's disease, in 2007. These guidelines were revised in 2015. Herein, we present the English version of the 2021 edition of the Japanese clinical guidelines for BCC. In the latest edition, all procedures were performed according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation systems. The clinical questions that could not be answered were selected for further analysis. A comprehensive literature search, systematic review, and recommendations for each clinical question were determined by a multidisciplinary expert panel comprising dermatologists, a plastic and reconstructive surgeon, and a pathologist. Surgical resection is the gold-standard therapy of BCC. Radiotherapy or topical treatments, other than surgical resection, have been used in some cases. Patients with unresectable or metastatic BCC require systemic therapy. Novel agents, such as immune response modifiers or hedgehog pathway inhibitors, are emerging worldwide for the treatment of BCC. Based on these viewpoints, four relevant clinical questions regarding, surgical resection, radiotherapy, topical treatment, and systemic therapy, were raised in this report that aims to help clinicians select suitable therapies for their patients.

Estimating remaining life expectancy in veterans with basal cell carcinoma using an automated electronic health record scoring system: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Active surveillance may be considered for low-risk basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) in patients with limited life expectancy; however, estimates of life expectancy are not readily available. Veterans Health Administration's Care Assessment Need (CAN) score may address this problem. OBJECTIVE: We examined the CAN score's performance in predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year mortality in US veterans with BCC. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used national Veterans Health Administration's electronic medical record data. The CAN score's performance in the prediction of mortality in veterans with BCC was evaluated based on tests of goodness-of-fit, discrimination, and calibration. RESULTS: For 54,744 veterans with BCC treatment encounters between 2013 and 2018, the CAN score performed well in the prediction of mortality based on multiple tests. A threshold CAN score of 90 had a positive predictive value of 55% for 3-year mortality, clinically useful in identifying patients with intermediate-term survival. LIMITATIONS: The study relied upon the combination of diagnosis codes and procedure codes to identify BCC cases. CONCLUSION: The CAN score has the potential to improve the quality of cancer care for veterans by providing clinicians with an estimate of life expectancy and facilitating conversations in cases where active surveillance can be considered.

Non-Surgical Therapeutic Strategies for Non-Melanoma Skin Cancers.

OPINION STATEMENT: Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is a globally prevalent skin disease, with basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma accounting for 99% of NMSC cases. While surgical excision is the most common approach, numerous non-surgical therapies have rapidly advanced in recent years. In cases of low-risk NMSC, alongside surgical excision, priority should be given to physical therapy and photodynamic therapy. Physical therapy modalities, exemplified by electrodessication and curettage, emerge as safe and efficacious alternatives. In juxtaposition, photodynamic therapy, albeit relatively more costly, assumes preference for patients exhibiting heightened cosmetic concerns owing to the scarring risks inherent to physical therapy and surgical excision. Notably, the combination of curettage and photodynamic therapy has exhibited remarkable efficacy in the treatment of nodular basal cell carcinoma. Additionally, for elderly patients who may be intolerant to stimulation, modified photodynamic therapy offers an almost painless option. When surgery is unavoidable, photodynamic therapy can be a valuable adjunct, allowing for a more conservative surgical approach, either before or after the procedure. Radiotherapy holds a prominent role in comprehensive treatment strategies, especially for patients ineligible for surgical intervention or those with lesions precluding further surgical measures. In cases of NMSC exhibiting perineural invasion or lymphovascular involvement, adjunctive radiotherapy is advised; however, potential adverse effects necessitate careful consideration. For advanced NMSC cases where surgery and physical therapy fall short, immunotherapy provide viable solutions. Systemic therapy employing Hedgehog pathway inhibitors can be considered for patients with distant metastatic basal cell carcinoma, despite its low incidence, or individuals with locally advanced lesions who are not surgical candidates, or those encountering recurrences after resection and radiotherapy. However, close monitoring of disease progression and adverse reactions is crucial. In this evolving landscape of NMSC treatment, personalized and multidisciplinary approaches are key, ensuring optimal outcomes while prioritizing patient safety and satisfaction.

Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of basal cell carcinoma: a GRADE approach for evidence evaluation and recommendations by the Italian Association of Medical Oncology.

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common form of cancer, with a high impact on the public health burden and social costs. Despite the overall prognosis for patients with BCC being excellent, if lesions are allowed to progress, or in a small subset of cases harboring an intrinsically aggressive biological behavior, it can result in local spread and significant morbidity, and conventional treatments (surgery and radiotherapy) may be challenging. When a BCC is not amenable to either surgery or radiotherapy with a reasonable curative intent, or when metastatic spread occurs, systemic treatments with Hedgehog inhibitors are available. These guidelines were developed, applying the GRADE approach, on behalf of the Italian Association of Medical Oncologists (AIOM) to assist clinicians in treating patients with BCC. They contain recommendations with regard to the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up, from primitive tumors to those locally advanced or metastatic, addressing the aspects of BCC management considered as priorities by a panel of experts selected by AIOM and other national scientific societies. The use of these guidelines in everyday clinical practice should improve patient care.

[Current Management of Basal Cell Carcinoma]. / Aktuelles Management des Basalzellkarzinoms.

For the management of basal cell carcinoma, the primary performance of a risk stratification, which is decisive for the further diagnostic and therapeutic steps, is becoming increasingly important.Various non-invasive methods are available to confirm the clinical diagnosis. Histological confirmation of the diagnosis is recommended in unclear cases. In poorly displaced lesions, preoperative cross-sectional imaging of the tumor area should be performed to exclude osseous infiltration.The gold standard in treatment remains surgery, which should be performed by means of micrographically controlled surgery if possible. In addition, there are other therapeutic methods such as radiotherapy or a number of topical therapy options (photodynamic therapy, cryotherapy or application of 5-fluorouracil or imiquimod), which can be used in certain cases. Also for advanced or metastatic basal cell carcinoma, effective drugs are available in the form of the hedgehog inhibitors, for which there is now several years of application experience with regard to efficacy and handling of adverse events. With the PD-1 inhibitor cemiplimab, a further therapeutic option for non-operable or metastatic tumors has been available since June 2021.The most important preventive measure is consistent textile or chemical UV protection in already affected individuals. In addition, nicotinamide and celecoxib can be used orally for prevention. For follow-up, the current S2k guideline recommends regular self-monitoring and standardized medical check-ups.

European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for diagnosis and treatment of basal cell carcinoma-update 2023.

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common malignant tumour in white populations. Multidisciplinary experts from European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO), European Dermatology Forum, European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), Union Européenne des Médecins Spécialistes, and the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology developed updated recommendations on diagnosis and treatment of BCC. BCCs were categorised into 'easy-to-treat' (common) and 'difficult-to-treat' according to the new EADO clinical classification. Diagnosis is based on clinico-dermatoscopic features, although histopathological confirmation is mandatory in equivocal lesions. The first-line treatment of BCC is complete surgery. Micrographically controlled surgery shall be offered in high-risk and recurrent BCC, and BCC located on critical anatomical sites. Topical therapies and destructive approaches can be considered in patients with low-risk superficial BCC. Photodynamic therapy is an effective treatment for superficial and low-risk nodular BCCs. Management of 'difficult-to-treat' BCCs should be discussed by a multidisciplinary tumour board. Hedgehog inhibitors (HHIs), vismodegib or sonidegib, should be offered to patients with locally advanced and metastatic BCC. Immunotherapy with anti-PD1 antibodies (cemiplimab) is a second-line treatment in patients with a progression of disease, contraindication, or intolerance to HHI therapy. Radiotherapy represents a valid alternative in patients who are not candidates for or decline surgery, especially elderly patients. Electrochemotherapy may be offered when surgery or radiotherapy is contraindicated. In Gorlin patients, regular skin examinations are required to diagnose and treat BCCs at an early stage. Long-term follow-up is recommended in patients with high-risk BCC, multiple BCCs, and Gorlin syndrome.

Advancing Cancer Research: Current Knowledge on Cutaneous Neoplasia.

Skin cancers require a multidisciplinary approach. The updated guidelines introduce new insights into the management of these diseases. Melanoma (MM), the third most common skin cancer, a malignant melanocytic tumor, which is classified into four major histological subtypes, continues to have the potential to be a lethal disease. The mortality-incidence ratio is higher in Eastern European countries compared to Western European countries, which shows the need for better prevention and early detection in Eastern European countries. Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) remain the top two skin cancers, and their incidence continues to grow. The gold standard in establishing the diagnosis and establishing the histopathological subtype in BCC and SCC is a skin biopsy. Sebaceous carcinoma (SeC) is an uncommon and potentially aggressive cutaneous malignancy showing sebaceous differentiation. It accounts for 0.7% of skin cancers and 3-6.7% of cancer-related deaths. Due to the rapid extension to the regional lymph nodes, SeC requires early treatment. The main treatment for sebaceous carcinoma is surgical treatment, including Mohs micrographic surgery, which has the advantage of complete margin evaluation and low recurrence rates. Primary cutaneous lymphomas (PCLs) are a heterogeneous group of lymphoproliferative diseases, with no evidence of extracutaneous determination at the moment of the diagnosis. PCLs have usually a very different evolution, prognosis, and treatment compared to the lymphomas that may secondarily involve the skin. The aim of our review is to summarize the important changes in the approach to treating melanoma, non-melanoma skin, cutaneous T and B cell lymphomas, and other types of skin cancers. For all skin cancers, optimal patient management requires a multidisciplinary approach including dermatology, medical oncology, and radiation oncology.

Effectiveness of a patient decision aid for patients with superficial basal cell carcinoma: A pre- and post-implementation study.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates whether using a patient decision aid (PDA) for patients with superficial basal-cell carcinoma (sBCC) results in a decreased decisional conflict level and increased knowledge. METHODS: In a prospective multicentre study, patient groups were included before and after implementation of a PDA. Decisional conflict levels were compared directly after making the treatment decision, measured once as the mean score on the decisional conflict scale (DCS). Higher scores correspond with higher conflict levels (0-100). Secondary outcomes were knowledge on treatment options, recognizing a BCC, and risk factors for developing a BCC measured on an adapted version of a validated knowledge questionnaire for melanoma patients, and patient satisfaction with the PDA. RESULTS: Data was available for 103 patients in the control-group and 109 in the PDA-group. The mean DCS score in the control-group was 22.78 (SD 14.76) compared to 22.34 (SD 14.54) in the PDA-group; the decrease was non-significant (p = 0.828). The average percentage correct answers on the knowledge questionnaire increased from 76.5% in the control-group to 80.5% in the PDA-group (p = 0.044). According to the majority of patients in the PDA-group (73.7%) the PDA had added value. CONCLUSION: Using the PDA had no significant effect on decisional conflict levels, but increased overall knowledge on relevant issues concerning sBCC. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The PDA can be used as an informational tool by patients with sBCC.

Immunotherapy for keratinocyte cancers. Part I: Immune-related epidemiology, risk factors, pathogenesis, and immunotherapy management of keratinocyte cancers.

The important role of the immune system in the surveillance and control of keratinocyte cancers (KCs), namely squamous and basal cell carcinomas, is increasingly appreciated, as new immunotherapies have recently become available. As the field of immunotherapy is rapidly evolving, this review synthesizes key concepts and highlights important cellular components within the immune system responsible for attacking KCs. We review the most current data on the epidemiology, risk factors, and immunotherapy management for KCs. Patients will seek advice from dermatologists to help explain why immunotherapies work for KCs and whether they might be appropriate for different clinical scenarios. Collaboration with medical colleagues across different disciplines to evaluate KCs for response to immunotherapy and early recognition of immune-related adverse events will help to optimize patient outcomes.

Skin Cancer in Skin of Color.

Skin cancer is often associated with greater morbidity and mortality in skin of color patients because most medical literature and research on skin cancer to date has been predominantly focused on lighter skin types. It is crucial that dermatologic providers be able to recognize different presentations of skin cancer in skin of color patients to optimize the early detection of these tumors and ensure equitable outcomes. This article details the epidemiology, risk factors, clinical features, and disparities in the treatment of melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, and mycosis fungoides subtype of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma in skin of color patients.

Recommendations of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology on skin cancer management in older patients.

INTRODUCTION: Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is becoming ever more prevalent among older adults. However, older adults with NMSC are often underrepresented in clinical trials and guidelines on effective management is still unclear. The International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) created a multi-disciplinary task force to explore the potential in developing practical guidelines for the treatment of older patients with basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and skin (cutaneous) squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search to identify relevant and up-to-date literature on treatment of NMSC in older adults was conducted on various databases including MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, and PubMed. The resulting papers were discussed by an expert panel, leading to a consensus recommendation. RESULTS: A total of 154 articles were identified for the expert panel to utilise in generating consensus recommendations. A major focus on geriatric assessment and management options including surgery, radiotherapy, systemic therapy, clinical monitoring, and medical/medicophysical therapy were reviewed for recommendations. DISCUSSION: Patient age should not be the sole deciding factor in the management of patients with NMSC. Assessment from a multidisciplinary team (MDT) is crucial, and the decision-making process should consider the patient's lifestyle, needs, and expectations. A comprehensive geriatric assessment should also be considered. Patients should feel empowered to advocate for themselves and have their views considered a part of the MDT discussion.

The therapeutic dilemma of basal cell carcinoma in older adults: A review of the current literature.

Skin cancer is known to be a significant health care threat due to the massively increasing numbers of diagnoses. In 2019, 4 million basal cell carcinoma (BCC) cases were diagnosed globally, making BCC the most frequent of all cancers worldwide in fair skinned populations. Given the increasing life-expectancy for all countries worldwide (by 2050, the world's population of people aged 60 years and older will have doubled), the incidence of BCC is expected to keep increasing in the future. Management of BCCs is challenging, especially among older adults, as mortality due to BCCs is extremely rare, whereas locally destructive growth can cause significant morbidity in certain cases. Therapeutic management in this population is further hampered because of the presence of comorbidities, frailty, and the heterogeneity of these aspects in older patients, leading to treatment dilemmas. A literature review was conducted to identify relevant patient, tumour, and treatment related factors that should be considered in the decision making for BCC treatment in older adults. This narrative review synthesizes all aspects concerning BCC treatment in older adults and aims to make some specific suggestions considering BCC treatment in older adults that can be used in daily practice. We found that nodular BCC was found to be the most common subtype in older adults, most frequently located in the head and neck region. In non-facial BCCs, current literature has shown no significant impact on the quality of life (QoL) in older patients. Besides comorbidity scores, functional status should guide clinicians in treatment decisions. Taking all aspects into account when making treatment decisions is of great importance. When treating superficial BCCs on difficult-to-reach lesions in older adults, a clinician-administered treatment should be suggested because of possible impaired mobility in these patients. Based on current literature, we recommend assessing the comorbidities, the functional status, and frailty in older patients with BCC to evaluate life expectancy. In patients with low-risk BCCs and a limited life expectancy (LLE), an active surveillance or watchful waiting strategy can be suggested.

Keratinocytic skin cancers-Update on the molecular biology.

Although much attention has been devoted to a detailed genomic exposition of cutaneous melanoma, other nonmelanoma skin cancers have also recently been subjected to similar analytical scrutiny. Chief among these are the most common malignancies worldwide: basal cell carcinomas and cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas. In this review, the authors summarize their latest knowledge about the molecular pathways and therapeutic opportunities attendant to these keratinocytic skin cancers. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: The most common cancers in the United States arise from skin cells called keratinocytes. Although these tumors are not formally tracked by the National Cancer Institute, it is estimated that there are millions of skin cancers called basal cell carcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas. This article reviews the current recent genetic insights into these tumors and therapeutic opportunities.

Intervenciones para el carcinoma basocelular cutáneo (revisión Cochrane): Resumen de las principales comparaciones e interpretación práctica de los resultados / Interventions for Basal Cell Carcinoma: Summary of Main Comparisons From a Cochrane Review and a Practical Interpretation of Findings

Existen numerosas modalidades de tratamiento para el manejo de los carcinomas basocelulares (CBC), pero se desconoce la real eficacia y seguridad entre las alternativas quirúrgicas y no quirúrgicas disponibles. Este artículo resume la evidencia encontrada en la reciente revisión Cochrane de Thomson et al. y facilita la interpretación de sus resultados entre la comunidad científica iberolatinoamericana. La gran mayoría de la evidencia evaluada proviene de estudios individuales que impidieron la realización de una revisión sistemática cuantitativa. La escisión quirúrgica convencional continúa siendo la terapia más eficaz para el tratamiento de los CBC de bajo riesgo. La mayoría de estudios incluyeron tamaños de muestra pequeños y algunos tuvieron problemas con el cegamiento, lo que influiría en resultados subjetivos tales como el dolor o la cosmesis. Existe una falta de estandarización en relación con los desenlaces de recurrencia y de resultados cosméticos, lo que en conjunto afecta no solo la validez interna sino también la validez externa y la reproducibilidad de los estudios (AU)

Numerous surgical and nonsurgical modalities are available to treat basal cell carcinoma (BCC), but their true effectiveness and safety is unknown. This article summarizes the evidence presented in a recent Cochrane review and aims to facilitate the interpretation of the review's findings for the Spanish and Latin American scientific communities. Much of the evidence the reviewers found came from single studies, preventing meta-analysis. Conventional surgical excision continues to be the most effective treatment for low-risk BCC. Most studies had small sample sizes, and some had problems with blinding, limitations which will have affected the assessment of subjective outcomes, such as pain and cosmetic results. The authors identified a lack of standardization in relation to recurrences and cosmetic outcomes that threatens not only the internal validity of the studies but also their external validity and reproducibility (AU)

[Translated article] Interventions for Basal Cell Carcinoma: Summary of Main Comparisons From a Cochrane Review and a Practical Interpretation of Findings / Intervenciones para el carcinoma basocelular cutáneo (revisión Cochrane): Resumen de las principales comparaciones e interpretación práctica de los resultados

Numerous surgical and nonsurgical modalities are available to treat basal cell carcinoma (BCC), but their true effectiveness and safety is unknown. This article summarizes the evidence presented in a recent Cochrane review and aims to facilitate the interpretation of the review's findings for the Spanish and Latin American scientific communities. Much of the evidence the reviewers found came from single studies, preventing meta-analysis. Conventional surgical excision continues to be the most effective treatment for low-risk BCC. Most studies had small sample sizes, and some had problems with blinding, limitations which will have affected the assessment of subjective outcomes, such as pain and cosmetic results. The authors identified a lack of standardization in relation to recurrences and cosmetic outcomes that threatens not only the internal validity of the studies but also their external validity and reproducibility (AU)

Existen numerosas modalidades de tratamiento para el manejo de los carcinomas basocelulares (CBC), pero se desconoce la real eficacia y seguridad entre las alternativas quirúrgicas y no quirúrgicas disponibles. Este artículo resume la evidencia encontrada en la reciente revisión Cochrane de Thomson et al. y facilita la interpretación de sus resultados entre la comunidad científica iberolatinoamericana. La gran mayoría de la evidencia evaluada proviene de estudios individuales que impidieron la realización de una revisión sistemática cuantitativa. La escisión quirúrgica convencional continúa siendo la terapia más eficaz para el tratamiento de los CBC de bajo riesgo. La mayoría de estudios incluyeron tamaños de muestra pequeños y algunos tuvieron problemas con el cegamiento, lo que influiría en resultados subjetivos tales como el dolor o la cosmesis. Existe una falta de estandarización en relación con los desenlaces de recurrencia y de resultados cosméticos, lo que en conjunto afecta no solo la validez interna sino también la validez externa y la reproducibilidad de los estudios (AU)